Posted 2006-08-29 10:16 (#39646 - in reply to #39643) Subject: What toponyms?
mantas - 2006-08-29 8:57 AM
Lutz, would you please use your brains for once ?
The treaties of Vytautas and Order were nothing more that a treaty of victim and bandit: you say anything the bad guy wants just so he don't kill you.
I don't see how forced agreement of 1384 can disproof toponims recorded in 12xx. I also see no connection between political statements and linguistic dilemma.
Well, honestly - I don't expect you to use any LOGICAL arguments. You are just the wrong guy to expect use of brains, and you stick to a wrong topic to win over. You look very much in your own role when shouting curses though
Lutz Szemkus - 2006-08-25 8:17 PM
Mantas poured out his usual dilettante garbage into the forum:
The crussaders have documented mixed western-eastern baltic evidence UPON invassion, and we see some of the toponims preserved AFTER crussades stoped.
After the Battle of Zalgiris/Tannenberg/Grunwald Vytautas/Witowd - in the position of the victor - falsely claimed that Scaluva ans Sudovia were the lands of his ancestors.
And what does Vytautas admit in the peace treaty of 1384 with the Teutonic Order?